MISSION
Defending Our Constitutional Guarantees
How do we defend our protected rights? We refuse to be hand-sitters and take organized action. It's crucial we consider this framework for social change including efforts by leaders to mobilize resources—most notably, time, money, and energy—of a supportive demographic and to direct them into effective political, legal and affirmative action. The problem is not the lack of a collective desire for a positive future, but the lack of a collective vehicle for positive action. We are driving 3 vehicle solutions.
1. Legal Precedence
​​
Mission one is to challenge the ‘infringement on personal liberty’ of our ‘constitutional guarantees’. Supreme Court Justice William Douglas famously warned the court in his dissent of Terry v Ohio, “that to give the police greater power than a magistrate is to take a long step down the totalitarian path.” Douglas cautioned that there are “powerful hydraulic pressures…that bear heavily on the Court to water down constitutional guarantees and give the police the upper hand.” Our effort will culminate in 11 TAC demographic zones to challenge bad precedence in all 11 geographic zones of the Unites States Courts of Appeals and United States District Courts.
2. Affirmative Action
​​
Mission two is to mobilize resources for affirmative action(s). The present social movement primarily comprised of cop watchers, auditors and alternative journalists does not lack a collective desire for a positive future but is lacking a collective vehicle for positive action. Strength in numbers is the common denominator for any social movement to succeed. According to social movement theory stage 1 has already brilliantly been completed with ‘emergence’ and now it’s time to accomplish stage 2 with ‘coalescence’, to unite for the common good. The present conditions and associated discontent cannot easily explain why we don’t organize. This includes the use of mainstream media and social networking to influence the news media and win favorable publicity to convince the public of the justness of our cause.
3. Empowering Pro Se
​​
Mission three is to empower Pro Se jurisprudence to benefit the majority recognized by their precarity. We won’t feasibly be able to service every court case from every member, but we can embolden the right to represent oneself in court as a long-established right in the United States. Like the advocacy before us that set out to defeat the Junk Debt Buyers rubberstamp judgements through shared experiences on Pro Se cause – we too can develop the same resources for case-by-case study of the issues. These simple defenses from routine catalog of charges like obstruction and interference do not require complicated Pro Se arguments to defeat them in court. We expect to initially lose many in local kangaroo courts, and over time, change the tide of wins through public education and dissemination of information. For those courts who maliciously convict the exercise of our protected rights – see mission one !